RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to at least general under honorable conditions. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was set up and arrested for possession of cocaine when another service member lured him to an abandoned location and put the bag of cocaine in his hand. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because at the time, he was told pursuing having his record changed would not result in any change. He provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, in support of his application. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 4 Apr 90, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On or about 1 Mar 91, he was charged with possession and/or distribution of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) On 9 Jul 91, he requested discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial per AFI 39-10, Airman Separation Manual, Chapter 4. On 10 Jul 91, his Detachment Commander recommended the applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial be approved. The Air Base Group Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) concurred with granting the applicant’s request. In addition, his Group Commander concurred with his Detachment Commander’s recommendation to discharge him in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 12 Jul 91, the SJA found the case legally sufficient and recommended he receive a UOTHC discharge. In addition, the Commander agreed with the recommendation to discharge him in lieu of special-court martial. On 7 Aug 91, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was credited with 1 year, 4 months and 4 days of active service. On 19 Sep 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to upgrade his under other than honorable conditions discharge, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice, as compared to others in his similar situation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. 4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03466 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14.